Not logged in. Login or Become a member!

Featured Blog Categories:

Comments

Christopher Kowalsky Sr. @ 11:37PM on June 29, 2009
I noticed that we've been getting a whole new array of people posting comments on MrSkin.com. That's great. It seems like more and more skin fans are coming on board on a daily basis. I can only imagine what it's doing for the Web site's traffic and what it's doing for Mr. Skin's revenue. Now with this whole new comments system, we don't have to wait such a long time to get our postings up there. This takes the skin forum to a whole new level.
Count Rackula (Skinployee) @ 9:37AM on June 30, 2009

@Christopher Kowalsky Sr.:

Actually, YOU guys are taking it to a whole new level. We just built the ladder. Respect.
My wit razor sharp? Oh, you're just being FRESH!
Count Rackula (Skinployee) @ 9:36AM on June 30, 2009

@Dave:

Fresh as in "exciting"?
yeah, It's better now

thanks...
Christopher Kowalsky Sr. @ 7:47PM on June 30, 2009
I wonder if D has seen this blog posting. I like how the conversation between D and myself from June 28th was used as the defining example of razor-sharp wordplay. It's posted right there at the top of the page directly under the extremely hot picture of the late, great Farrah Fawcett. I wish that picture was a GIF, so we could see her actually unzipping that wet-suit over and over and over again.
Christopher Kowalsky Sr. @ 2:22AM on July 1, 2009

@Christopher Kowalsky Sr.:

The highlighted example above is to show people exactly what a thread looks like. It's just a conversation that's going on between two people or more. Genius, I say. Pure genius.
The email notifications are for losers who don't visit often enough @ mrskin.com!
Count Rackula (Skinployee) @ 10:48AM on July 1, 2009

@jarze:

Damn! Jarze is throwing down the gauntlet again! This guy visits the site more than me and I work here.
Christopher Kowalsky Sr. @ 8:38PM on July 1, 2009

@Count Rackula:

I think jarze enjoys throwing down the gauntlet. He may very well be MrSkin.com's toughest critic.
Christopher Kowalsky Sr. @ 12:03AM on July 1, 2009
You all hear that? We're losers if we choose to receive e-mail notifications. Maybe it DOES help to receive such notifications, because we don't have to keep going back to the same blog over and over again, unless we absolutely know that there's something new posted to it. Otherwise, we'll just be wasting our time going back when in fact we could be wasting our time looking at all the great naked ladies at MrSkin.com. I'm on the Web site EVERYDAY and I update my favorites in the members section, so there's plenty of naked flesh to keep my eyes busy for hours on end, so that shows you just how often I visit the site.
That's great.We have to have comments.What we need is Body-Double arguments.Are these damn directors choosing doubles that good.I always like to study and study and see if it really is the actress.We know Mr.Skin's policy but we want to see if it really is the actress.Kristy Swanson's bare butt in "Getting In "her and the so-called double have the same exact arm length.Her long arms give her away.It's her! It's my girls butt! She says no,But we all know,they lie.We need more Double-De-Ciphers helping out.Always a challenge.
Count Rackula (Skinployee) @ 10:53AM on July 1, 2009

@James:

Brah! Look at her HAIR. It's a totally different haircut. It's so much shorter in the back! That's a body double as sure as I'm sitting here. We all want it to be Kristy's ass, but it just isn't.

@Count Rackula:

Those damn directors.I did check her haircut.I compared her arm length.I'm in with fellow experts.A big debate.What gets me is these directors can find damn close ones.I'll look again.But the long arms.The same exact long arms.The debate goes on.
Christopher Kowalsky Sr. @ 8:52PM on July 1, 2009

@James:

You can't very well compare arm length to determine if it was a body double or really Kristy Swanson herself in the movie "Getting In." I'm gonna have to side with Count Rackula on this one and say that it is indeed a body double and not Swanson doing her own butt nudity, even though basing it on a haircut makes it difficult too. Don't study too hard James, it could put a strain on your eyes and then you won't be able to see NOTHING for long periods at a time. By the way, if you really wanna see Swanson in the buff, you can always check out her Playboy spread that she did years ago. It's the first and thus far only time that she's ever gotten naked for the cameras, so to speak.

Add your comment

Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
Comment Posting Terms

Mr Skin welcomes your comments. First time contributors will need to verify their email address before their first comment will be enabled to appear on the site. Inflammatory, illegal, and obscene comments will not be tolerated. Spam, solicitations, and other all other forms of advertising are strictly forbidden. Abusers will be banned and reported to the authorities. Mr Skin reserves the right to delete any comment at any time for any reason whatsoever, with no explanation necessary. Have fun! Note: If you have a question about your MrSkin.com membership, do not post a comment to the blog. Instead, use the customer service contact form.